Amal Clooney Revives an Archival Gold McQueen Dress for the King’s Trust Celebration

THE RUNDOWN

Elle
  • Amal Clooney wore a gold archival McQueen dress for her latest red carpet appearance at The King’s Trust celebration in London.

  • The gown originally debuted during the house’s fall 2007 runway show in Paris.

  • Amal was recently photographed at her husband George Clooney’s 65th birthday celebration in France.

Amal Clooneyreached into the fashion archives for her latest red carpet appearance.

Attending The King’s Trust’s 50th anniversary celebration alongside husband George Clooney, the human rights lawyer wore a gold sequined gown fromAlexander McQueen’s fall 2007 collection.

Amal Clooney at the King's Trust 50th Anniversary Celebration.

The archival design featured a V-neckline, cap sleeves, and a fitted column silhouette covered in intricate gold embellishment.

It first appeared on the runway in March 2007 during the house’s Paris Fashion Week show:

Advertisement

PARIS– March 1: Models walk down the catwalk during the Alexander McQueen's Fall 2007 line of cloth

Amal chose gold accessories for her look today, pairing the gown with pointed metallic pumps, a gold clutch, and delicate jewelry. She wore her hair in loose side-parted waves.

George stepped out in a classic look himself for the night, wearing a navy suit layered over a white dress shirt and dark tie.

The couple arrived at Royal Albert Hall holding hands ahead of the evening’s celebration.

King's Trust 50th anniversary

The event marked the 50th anniversary of The King’s Trust, thecharity founded by King Charles IIIin 1976 to help young people between the ages of 11 and 30 build practical life skills, prepare for careers, and connect with employment opportunities.

The Clooneys’ latest outing follows their recent trip to St. Tropez, France, where they werephotographedcelebrating George’s 65th birthday earlier this month.

You Might Also Like

Amal Clooney Revives an Archival Gold McQueen Dress for the King’s Trust Celebration

THE RUNDOWN Amal Clooney wore a gold archival McQueen dress for her latest red carpet appearance at The King’s Trust cel...
Steve Sarkisian goes scorched-earth on college football’s wild West culture | Exclusive

AUSTIN, TX – He’s trying to stay out of it, he really is. But we’re long past that futile exercise. It’s not a matter of when he speaks up, but how.

USA TODAY

So why not now?

When you’re the head coach at big, bad college sports behemothTexas, when you’re the former coach at another mega program atUSC, when you’ve worked under the greatest coach in college football history atAlabama, someone, at some point, wants your opinion.

“I try my best to not get consumed with how bad it is,” Steve Sarkisian says of college football’s five-year journey down the rabbit hole. ‘It just wears you out.”

OPINION:New CFP expansion plan would kill what college football does best

It’s too late for that.

In a college sports world where money fuels the engine of drastic, unrecognizable change, common sense is tied up and held hostage in the trunk. Right next to the donut-sized spare you better never have to use.

Until the damn car blows a tire.

“We all signed up to be part of the NCAA, and then we all allegedly make the rules,” Sarkisian said, and this interview with USA TODAY Sports began with him wondering aloud why anyone cares what he thinks.

It quickly morphed into buckle up, no one is safe.

“Everyone knows the rules, right?” he says, then says it again in case there’s any misunderstanding. “Thenwe go to our attorney general and say we don’t like that rule, let’s just sue. Right now, no one is afraid of the consequences.”

So now it’s time someone spoke up.

The College Football Playoff, and the selection committee. Free player movement, andprivate NIL. Forgotten academic standards. The systematic breakdown of amateur sports.

Sarkisian doesn’t need to do this, doesn’t need to say what someone must while others running the sport are bickering over millions and eventuallybillions. All in the name of higher education.

He may have the best team in the nation in 2026, and could begin the season on top of the preseason polls for the second consecutive year. He has taken theLonghornsto the CFP semifinals in the two of the past three seasons, and he lacks for absolutely nothing. Financial support, elite facilities, the framework to support players on and off the field.

Just put your head down and play ball and ignore it all, right? Only he can’t. Not anymore.

He sees the dichotomy of California, arguably the nation’s No. 1 public academic institution, seamlessly accepting 32 players from the transfer portal — some of those players on their third school. One on his fourth.

He’s sees Power conference schools — with Texas among them — spending their way to a championship roster, and big-money boosters with more control than ever. In some cases, they’ve become de facto team owners.

He sees free player movement gutting continuity and roster building and development. Sees players who not long ago couldn’t rub a couple of nickels together, now playing one school off the other for real, foundational wealth. Or others who believe there’s value in their game, only to find out there isn’t — and now they’ve lost their scholarship and they’re sitting with hundreds of others in a purgatory portal and may never get back in the game.

An environment where schools must play this unholy game to survive, and those with the financial wherewithal have an inherent advantage. He knows Texas is at the top of the food chain, but that doesn’t mean he can’t see the carnage below.

A true wild, wild West. No rules, no standards, no fear of being caught.

“It’s like we’ve forgotten about academics, yet less than 5% of these guys will play in the NFL,” Sarkisian said.

It is here where Sarkisian is reminded of the swift move allegedly pulled off earlier this spring by the Ole Miss staff. Clemson coach Dabo Swinney claims Ole Miss coaches were recruiting Tigers linebacker Luke Ferrelli while he was in class — and after he had just transferred from Cal. Sent Ferrelli a photo of a million dollar check, and Swinney has the receipts to prove it.

And NCAA enforcement has done nothing. Absolutely nothing.

Guess where Ferrelli is enrolled? Ole Miss. Which brings up another of the “inequitable” hills Sark is prepared to die on.

“At Texas, we will only take 50% of a player’s academic credit hours,” Sarkisian continues. “You may be a semester from graduating, but you’re going all the way back to 50% if you play here and want a degree. But at Ole Miss, they can take you. All you have to do is take basket weaving, and you can get an Ole Miss degree.”

If you think that’s harsh, we’re just getting started.

Behind the CFP curtain

The latest hot-button issue is the CFP, and the money-driven argu ment of 16 or 24 teams. Those favoring 24 teamssell it as more access, but for whom? Undoubtedly, more Power conference teams.

But Sarkisian has a bigger problem, one he says has yet to be addressed: the selection committee.

This goes beyond how the committee promised last season to focus on strength of schedule, and wound up right back at wins and losses as the determining factor. Beyond the ridiculous conference championship parameters that handcuffed the committee and left a 12-team playoff with Tulane and James Madison — instead of Notre Dame playing at Ole Miss and Texas playing at Oregon.

Is the committee actually watching every game of significance, every fall Saturday?

Not highlights,entiregames. And evaluating based on the entirety of the resume, including strength of schedule.

“The committee doesn’t have the bandwidth to watch that many games,” Sarkisian said. “They see the media and coaches polls, and they copy them. You’ve got a 12-team playoff, and that means there are at least 30 teams that impact it. Now all of a sudden, you want to go to 24? Now the polls become an even greater factor, because now you’re asking (the committee) to watch 40 teams a week — if not 50.”

The enormity of that statement stops Sarkisian mid-sentence: 40 or 50 teams in one weekend. He leans in to make the obvious point that everyone who watches ball Saturday from noon to well past midnight can clearly understand.

“I’m a football junkie,” he continues. “When we don’t play, I’m watching quad-box because it’s what I love. But I can’t keep up. I don’t vote anymore in the (US LBM) coaches poll, because it’s not fair for me to vote. I couldn’t tell you how NC State played against Wake Forest. How could I know?”

Texas coach Steve Sarkisian looks on during the first quarter of the game against the Georgia Bulldogs at Sanford Stadium on November 15, 2025 in Athens, Georgia.

CFP executive director Rich Clark says the committee has access to every game played every weekend, as well as previous games. Each committee member has their own iPad, and direct access to games to watch anytime, anywhere.

“I can assure you, they watch the games,” Clark said.

Advertisement

Six of the 13-member selection committee — nearly half — are full-time FBS athletic directors, including chairman and Arkansas AD Hunter Yurachek. Four members are former coaches — Mark Dantonio, Gus Malzahn, Jeff Tedford, Mike Riley — two are former players and one is a writer.

That brings us all the way back to strength of schedule vs. wins and losses. Because anyone can watch games, but can it be done through the lens of strength of schedule?

The selection committee began last season with stricter guidelines to heighten strength of schedule. It was all part of an unwritten you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours deal between the SEC the the CFP executive committee.

The SEC wouldmove to nine conference gamesand agree to a 16-team format beginning in 2026, and the committee would use strength of schedule as a significant factor in the selection process. They even added new strength of schedule metrics to the equation.

Yet the difference between Texas and Miami in 2025, Sarkisian says, was one loss — not strength of schedule.

Texas lost road games at Ohio State, Georgia and Florida, the latter likely preventing the Longhorns from earning a spot in the playoff. That one loss, Sarkisian said, shouldn’t have negated three Top 10 wins: No. 3 Texas A&M, No. 6 Oklahoma and No. 9 Vanderbilt.

Miami finished 10-2 in the ACC, and like Texas, failed to reach its conference championship game.

“(Miami coach) Mario Cristobal is a friend of mine, and they had a tremendous season’” Sarkisian said. “Miami lost to two unranked teams last year. What would their record have been if they played our schedule? What would our record have been if we played theirs? But there’s scheduling inequity.”

Cristobal has a simple response: “We beat the three SEC teams we played, including the team (Texas) lost to.”

Miami beat Florida in the regular season, and beat Texas A&M and Ole Miss in the CFP. The Canes had one Top 10 win in the regular season, at home against Notre Dame.

“Everyone talks about NIL. But my biggest gripe is the selection committee,” Sarkisian said. “There’s no transparency on what exactly the committee is doing. We have to figure that out.”

Now Sarkisian is getting lathered up, the former star quarterback at BYU allowing his competitive fire take over. Who among us believes Congress, the biggest do-nothing body next to the NCAA, could get on the same page and make an impact?

So you throw more garbage at the problem. Garbage in, garbage out.

“I’d go back to a four-team playoff, and have your own conference playoff to get the four teams if you want more inventory for your television partners,” Sarkisian said. “We have to think outside the box. Just adding teams and going to 24, that’s a very spastic view, thinking that’s going to solve the problem. Forever in college athletics, we don’t think about the unintended consequences of decisions we make. It’s all knee-jerk reactions. Look where it has gotten us.”

Rules, what rules?

Big-time college football and the NCAA. These two were never really made for each other, the former always finding workarounds for the rules of the latter. Sometimes legal, other times not.

When Sarkisian was the coach at USC in 2013, the school found a unique workaround for the problem of serving breakfast bagels to players. You could serve bagels, per NCAA rules. You could just couldn’t serve them with any spread — because it was considered an “excessive meal” instead of a “snack.” Hand on the bible truth.

So Sarkisian came up with the idea to buy a peanut grinder. Giving peanuts to players was legal, and if you threw the peanuts in the grinder, you had peanut butter. Legal peanut butter, not the illegal stuff bought at grocery stores.

Teach coach Steve Sarkisian reacts after the game against the Mississippi State Bulldogs at Davis Wade Stadium on October 25, 2025 in Starkville, Mississippi.

From peanut butter as an excessive meal, to ignoring blatant tampering. Some things never change with the sport's governing body.

“Think about where we are today, and that was not that long ago,” Sarkisian said. “Then I get to Texas in 2021, and the entire world changes. Conference realignment — of which we were a major player — NIL, free player movement, 12-team playoff, revenue sharing, and now we’re talking about a 24-team playoff. No one takes a breath to reset. It's all reactionary.”

He stares out the large window from his meticulous office in the south end zone of Memorial Stadium, and there’s a painting crew on Campbell-Williams Field. They’re painting the logo of a supplement company that agreed in 2025 to a multi-year deal, described by Texas athletic director Chris Del Conte as one of the most lucrative on-field signage in all of college sports.

Texas has the largest athletic budget in all of college sports, generating more than $270 million annually. And the school is always searching for more revenue drivers, more ways to stay ahead of the ever-changing financial landscape.

If the rule is he with the most money wins — and it clearly is — why wouldn’t all involved be chasing cash? Don’t blame Texas or Ohio State or USC or LSU for throwing around financial weight, or elite players for using financial leverage. They aren’t the problem.

College football is racing toward copying the NFL in every way imaginable — with the exception of how it’s structured. Rules aren’t enforceable, and enforcement is more unpredictable than ever.

Because enforcement leads to legal wrangling, which leads to millions in legal fees and lost suits ― and invariably no more sacred cows with litigation.

From arguing private NIL deals, to player movement, to eligibility, to finally and frighteningly,judge shopping to avoid consequences for gambling.

Just last week, two people close to the situation told USA TODAY Sports that Texas Tech quarterback Brendan Sorsby will sue the NCAA in Lubbock County, Texas to gain eligibility — if Sorsby and his attorney and the NCAA can’t work out a deal that gets Sorsby on the field in 2026.

The NCAA has voluminous evidence of Sorsby gambling on multiple sports with $1 and $2 bets, including gambling on Indiana to win in 2022 — when Sorsby was a freshman quarterback for the Hoosiers. Sorsby did not play in the game he bet, multiple people told USA Today Sports.

“There’s a reason in the NFL, when you get caught tampering, you get drilled. You lose draft picks,” Sarkisian said. ‘You don’t practice the right way, you lose practice days, coaches get fined. There are a lot of things in place to protect their rules and guardrails. Right now in college football, there’s no fear. People do whatever they want.”

SEC super league

We all know where this thing is headed if the NCAA, or whatever governance structure is eventually formed, can’t get its arms around the myriad problems.

If the federal government and/or the Oval Office can’t push through legislation to control the now uncontrollable.

But it’s not about finding an association of schools willing to start their own league. The pie-in-the-sky idea of the strongest in college football pulling away from the weak, thereby splintering and sucking the life from the sport.

It may be as simple as the SEC taking care of itself.

“There’s lot of sentiment for breaking away and having your own rules. That’s realistic,” Sarkisian said. “You’re going to sign up or you don't, but if you do, here’s our rules. Here’s how this thing is going to work.”

There’s nothing futile about that exercise of dramatic change.

And maybe it’s not a matter of when it happens, but how.

Matt Hayesis the senior national college football writer for USA TODAY Sports Network. Follow him on X at@MattHayesCFB.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Texas football coach Steve Sarkisian rips CFP committee, NCAA enforcement

Steve Sarkisian goes scorched-earth on college football’s wild West culture | Exclusive

AUSTIN, TX – He’s trying to stay out of it, he really is. But we’re long past that futile exercise. It’s not a matter of when he speaks...
The ex-German chancellor and Putin’s ‘buddy’ who Russia want to mediate Ukraine peace talks

Vladimir Putinhinted over the weekend that he foresaw the war inUkrainecoming to an end soon, while raising the prospect of talks with theEUto draw up new security arrangements for a post-war Europe.

The Independent US

The Russian president told reporters that he would be open to reopening lines of communication with Ukraine and Europe, ideally mediated by former German chancellor Gerhard Schröder.

“For me personally, the former Chancellor of the Federal Republic ofGermany, Mr Schröder, is preferable,” Putin said, asked on Saturday if he was willing to engage with Europe.

Gerhard Schroeder (R) arrives for a news conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin September 8, 2005 in Berlin (Getty)

European officials responded with instant concern, suggesting Schröder lacked the impartiality needed to behave as an “honest broker” and suggesting the offer looked like another bogus proposal aimed at dividing the Western alliance.

A German government spokesperson said on Friday that Berlin saw no signs that Moscow was interested in serious negotiations, after bothRussiaand Ukraine accused each other of breaching unilateral ceasefires.

Who is Gerhard Schröder?

Gerhard Schröder, now 82, was the chancellor of Germany between 1998 and 2005.

As a young person, he lifted himself out of poverty by juggling various jobs with night school to become a lawyer, before pivoting towards politics as an idealistic Marxist and environmentalist.

Schröder saw an astonishing rise through the Social Democratic Party (SDP) to unsettle Helmut Kohl’s 16-year grip on the chancellorship in 1998.

In power, he focused on reducing unemployment and rebuilding the economy at home, offering a contentious package of economically liberal welfare and labour reforms.

Russian President Vladimir Putin (L) and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder travel on an ICE high speed train December 21, 2004 on their way from Hamburg to Gottorf Castle in Schleswig, Germany (Getty)

He also curbed nuclear power and tied Germany’s energy needs to Russian fossil fuels, a move that haunted Berlin after the Russian invasion of Ukraine exposed how little influence that arrangement bought.

On the world stage, Schröder kept Germany out of the Iraq War, to the irritation of the United States, but committed troops to the Nato missions in Kosovo and Afghanistan, while balancing relations with Russia.

SDP support waned in his second term as the economy faltered, and he was forced out of office in 2005.

After leaving politics, he continued work on the Nord Stream gas pipelines and took a seat on the board of Russian oil giant Rosneft, which he gave up with the invasion in 2022.

Advertisement

He remained close to Putin and refused to condemn the war, massively straining his popularity at home.

What are his links to Putin?

Schröder took office during Putin’s first term as president and kept relations warm over the years.

He called Putin a “flawless democrat” in 2004 and sought closer integration between the two countries, approving the first Nord Stream pipeline between Russia and Germany shortly before leaving office.

Russian President Vladimir Putin (L) and the German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder (R) poses at the opening of the Hanover Fair 2005, a trade fair for industrial technology at the Congress Centrum April 11, 2005 in Hanover (Getty)

Schröder stayed friendly with Putin, even attending his birthday in Moscow in 2014, just a few months after the Russian invasion and annexation of Crimea.

In 2016, he joined the board of directors behind the construction ofNord Stream 2. That pipeline never went in to service and was damaged by underwater explosions in the Baltic Sea in 2022.

How has Europe reacted?

Putin’s suggestion that Schröder could help mediate talks between Russia and the EU swiftly met opposition from European officials.

A mediator “cannot be Putin's buddy”, Michael Roth, a former SPD lawmaker and chair of the foreign affairs committee, told the Tagesspiegel newspaper.

Germany's Europe minister, Gunther Krichbaum, said that Schröder did not have the credentials to be an “honest broker”.

“He is, and certainly has been, heavily influenced by Mr Putin. Close friendships may be legitimate anywhere in the world, but they do not help one to be perceived as an impartial mediator,” Krichbaum said.

Kaja Kallas speaks with the media as she arrives for a meeting of EU foreign ministers at the European Council building in Brussels, Monday, May 11 (AP)

Estonian foreign minister Margus Tsahkna dismissed also weighed in on Monday, rubbishing Putin’s plan.

“Gerhard Schroeder is a Putin idea. I think they are very close. Gerhard Schroeder won't be representing Europe,” said Tsahkna.

European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas also dismissed Putin’s suggestion.

"If we give the right to Russia to appoint a negotiator on our behalf, you know, that would not be very wise," Kallas told reporters as she arrived for a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels.

As Schroder had lobbied for Russian state companies, “he would be sitting on both sides of the table,” Kallas said.

The ex-German chancellor and Putin’s ‘buddy’ who Russia want to mediate Ukraine peace talks

Vladimir Putinhinted over the weekend that he foresaw the war inUkrainecoming to an end soon, while raising the prospect of talks with ...
“I think, if we all know LeBron James, he’s gonna take …

Advertisement

USA TODAY

Wade does not know for sure whether James plans to retire at the end of the 2025-26 season if theLos Angeles Lakersbow out to theOklahoma City Thunder, or whether James wants to stay in L.A. or take his talents to another team for another year. But he believes the James he knows will need some time to think it over. “That’s the question,” Wade, who made four consecutive NBA Finals and won two championships alongside James, said during the Game 4 broadcast.“I think, if we all know LeBron James, he’s gonna take some time off and go drink some wine. He’ll go out a little bit around the world,but he’s gonna spend some time with his family. He’s gonna sit down and try to make the best decision for the James family at the end of the day.”

This article originally appeared on Hoops Hype:“I think, if we all know LeBron James, he’s gonna take …

“I think, if we all know LeBron James, he’s gonna take …

Advertisement Wade does not know for sure whether James plans to retire at the end of the 2025-26 season if theLos Angeles Lakers...
King jokes ‘I need more training’ after struggling with surgical robot

The King joked that he would need technology training after attempting to operate anew surgical robotat a cancer centre.

The Telegraph The King gets to grips with the controls of the surgical robot at Guy's Hospital

The monarch, who has been receiving treatment for cancer for more than two years, met staff and patients at the cancer centre at Guy’s Hospital in London on Monday.

Raymond Burgess, 69, from south London, described how hischemotherapyleft him with a bad taste in his mouth, prompting the King to sympathise: “It’s an awful sort of metallic taste. It doesn’t exactly help with eating.”

The King meets patients David Coleman and Raymond Burgess. Mr Burgess, with his wife alongside him, shared experiences of chemotherapy with His Majesty

During  his visit, the King was given a step-by-step presentation of the new fifth-generation Da Vinci Surgical System, which enables smaller and more precise incisions during bladder surgery.

The robot, which is used by the NHS, can significantly reduce patient operating and recovery times because of its precision.

The King took a seat to look through a headset while controlling the robotic hands on an operating table behind him.

A £5 note alongside an internal model of a bladder was used to show the powerful magnification of the equipment

On display was a small model of the internal bladder and a £5 note, the tiny text on which was used to illustrate the high magnifications possible.

Prof Ben Challacombe, a consultant urological surgeon, explained that the technology was so precise it would allow him to see things that the human eye could not.

Placing his fingers into the controls, the King struggled at first to get to grips with the mechanism, saying: “I think I need more practice. I’ll have to come back after some more training.”

Prof Challacombe replied: “We’ll have to get you back for a full immersive course.”

The King speaking to Prof Ben Challacombe, a consultant urological surgeon

The King asked many questions in the laboratory. Told that the doctors now use AI in their work with cancer, he asked: “What proportion of the time is it right? Because it’s not always right.”

In the Chemotherapy Village, the King met patients who could benefit from the technological advances.

Advertisement

Mr Burgess told him: “All the staff have been fantastic, all so welcoming and lovely. It’s very comfortable here. Just can’t taste anything, apart from lemons and limes mostly.”

Another patient, who did not want to be named, explained that she had taken her laptop into the centre to carry on working while wearing a cold cap for her breast cancer treatment.

The monarch told her: “That’s extraordinary. Very brave. I wish you all the best.”

On leaving, the King greeted a crowd of more than 150 people, shaking hands with patients as he wished them luck with their treatment.

The King meets members of the medical team at the cancer centre

Prof Challacombe said after the visit: “He was very interested in what this could do in terms of improving outcomes for patients.

“So I told him about decreased pain and scars and decreased length of stay, and he actually used the phrase to me, ‘This seems much more minimally invasive than the surgery that I’ve previously heard of’, which was nice.

“I could see he was speaking from the point of view of having been through treatment himself.”

The King was diagnosed with an undisclosed form of cancer in February 2024, after being treated in hospital for an enlarged prostate.

In December, he revealed the“good news”that the weekly treatment he had endured for almost two years was being scaled back.

A Buckingham Palace spokesman said at the time: “His Majesty has responded exceptionally well to treatment and his doctors advise that ongoing measures will now move into a precautionary phase.”

Since his diagnosis, the King has been “greatly encouraged” by the outpouring of public support he has received and has gone on to make cancer awareness a cornerstone of his public work.

When he returned to public duties for the first time since his diagnosis, he chose to visit the University College Hospital Macmillan Cancer Centre, chatting with fellow patients, and sympathising with them about the side effects of treatment and the initial shock of diagnosis.

He has repeatedly called for more people to be tested early, extolling the benefits of early diagnosis.

King jokes ‘I need more training’ after struggling with surgical robot

The King joked that he would need technology training after attempting to operate anew surgical robotat a cancer centre. The mona...

 

CR MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com